Rank a shortlist

Rank your entire shortlist

Upload up to 50 CVs. Verdict analyzes each one against the same rubric in parallel, then ranks the field on six dimensions — with the evidence behind every score.

The challenge

Comparing many candidates

You have 15 strong CVs for one role. Reading them one by one is time-consuming — and by the tenth CV, it's natural to lose track of the earlier ones' strengths.

Verdict treats the shortlist as a parallel job: every candidate is analyzed against the same six-dimension rubric, by the same lenses, against the same job description. The ranking falls out of the scores — no head-to-head matchups required.

The method

Parallel analysis, comparable scores

Each CV is treated as an independent unit of work. The same rubric is applied to all of them, in parallel, with names and protected attributes disregarded in the score.

Step 1 — Parallel analysis

Every CV is read independently

Each candidate is analyzed against the job description on its own — capability, track record, trajectory, influence, domain edge, and risk surface. No pairwise matchups; the score is anchored to the role, not to other candidates.

Ana
analyzing
Ben
analyzing
Cal
analyzing
Dina
analyzing
Eve
analyzing
Finn
analyzing
Gina
analyzing
Hugo
analyzing
8 analyses run in parallel
Per-candidate rubric
Capability
4
Track record
5
Trajectory
4
Influence
3
Domain edge
5
Risk surface
4
Same rubric for all
Step 2 — Scoring on the rubric

Six dimensions, one to five

The Verdict Rubric scores each candidate from 1–5 on six dimensions. Every conclusion cites the line in the CV that supports it. If the citation isn't convincing, the score isn't either.

Same rubric, same lenses, same evidence-grounded format — every candidate gets the same treatment.

Step 3 — Aggregate ranking

A clean leaderboard, with caveats

Scores aggregate into a weighted total. The leaderboard shows the field ranked, with the top three highlighted, plus the margin of preference between adjacent candidates.

When two candidates are too close to separate confidently, the verdict says so — out loud — and points at the dimensions where the difference is real.

Final ranking — 8 candidates
1Ana
27/30
2Cal
25/30
3Gina
24/30
4Eve
22/30
5Ben
20/30
6Dina
18/30
7Finn
16/30
8Hugo
14/30
Top 3 highlighted

Live

The ranking builds up as analyses complete

Verdict — live ranking0 / 8 done

What you see while it runs

01

Live leaderboard

A ranking that updates in real time as candidate analyses complete. Watch the field sort itself out.

02

Per-candidate progress

Each candidate shows which phase of the analysis is active (reading, scoring, synthesis) so you always know what is in flight.

03

Click any row

After a candidate analysis completes, click the row to open the full Verdict Card — six dimensions, citations, written recommendation.

What to expect
8 candidates
individual analyses
4–6 min
15 candidates
individual analyses
6–10 min
50 candidates
individual analyses
15–25 min

Times depend on server load · Analyses run in parallel

Evaluate your candidates

Upload two CVs for a head-to-head, or up to 50 for a ranked shortlist. Paste the JD and watch the verdicts build.

Start evaluating →